Witness Interrogation

This will be more of a Q&A for those who've actually seen or encountered a Bigfoot. 

If you'd like to answer the questions you may do so in numbered answers. I thank you.

1. Were your intentions to set out to find or have an encounter with a Bigfoot, or was it a surprise?

2.Whether you were searching for the creature or your sighting was a complete surprise, was it love at first sight? Or would you use a different term to describe your sighting?

3. If you answered No to #2 what term(s) would you use to describe your feeling(s)?

4. If you had doubts about what you were witnessing, how long did those doubts last? a).Seconds, b).minutes, c).days, d.)years?

5. Have you since returned to the area of your encounter? 

6. Do you feel as though your encounter is an unsolved mystery within your life that you'd like to see solved?

7. Upon mental playback of your encounter is there anything you wish you had done differently? 

8. Do certain aspects of the creature itself or your surroundings stick out more than others?

9. Have any aspects of your encounter changed or become more relevant since the initial happening?

10. Do you find that the circumstances surrounding your encounter have been a).helpful, b).harmful or c).neither pertaining to everyday life or your overall well being?

There is no rhyme or reason to this line of questioning. Just a very broad survey. 

*Protection orders may be applied for and will be promptly denied. There is currently no system in place to report or file grievance against a Bigfoot who may have abused you physically, mentally, emotionally or otherwise. 

Bigfoot Chopping Block

Within Bigfoot there comes an endless stream of information. A crap ton coming through from every other source available. Some is good quality interesting info. Some is entertainment and still valuable as far as I'm concerned. Some is absolute garbage/bullshit. And some is in no way relevant at all, still leaving it a notch above the bullshit.

My question is how can the community better categorize info? How can they successfully incorporate sound judgement and come to an agreement about what stays and what goes?

I think there should be a community wide system implemented where a piece of information is submitted and given a grace period of several days assuring as many members as possible have access to viewing and then they vote. Chopping Block, Authentic or Undecided. Ultimately ending or putting to rest the majority's take. All info should then be archived in their respective categories. 

Foot prints: Chopping Block, Authentic, Undecided.

Video: Chopping Block, Authentic, Undecided.

Photos: Chopping Block, Authentic, Undecided. 

Vocals: Chopping Block, Authentic, Undecided.

News Articles: Chopping Block, Authentic, Undecided.

And so on. 

In no way do I think it will end debate and argument, but it may give insight as to where everyone stands as a whole on the subject. 

I think cases should be capable of being reopened at request according to an intricate set of rules that will be set in place. More of a game than law. 

I like it. Let's get on that.